Astronomers have long thought solar systems follow a simple pattern similar to our own: small, rocky worlds orbit close to the Sun, while large gaseous planets sit further out.
For decades, astronomers have believed this arrangement to be the norm across the Universe. Observations of distant planetary systems have broadly supported the idea that rocky planets form near their star, with gas giants developing farther away where conditions are cooler.
But a newly studied star system may turn that assumption on its head.
Using the European Space Agency’s CHaracterising ExOPlanet Satellite (Cheops), scientists have found evidence of an unusual «inside-out» planetary system orbiting a star known as LHS 1903.
LHS 1903 is a small, cool red dwarf star that shines far less brightly than the Sun. A team led by Thomas Wilson from the University of Warwick combined data from several telescopes on Earth and in space to study planets orbiting the star.
They initially identified three planets: a rocky world closest to the star, followed by two gaseous planets. This, researchers say, looked entirely normal.
The surprise came when the team analysed Cheops data more closely and spotted a fourth planet, orbiting furthest from the star. Against expectations, this distant planet also appeared to be rocky.
«That makes this an inside-out system, with a planet order of rocky-gaseous-gaseous-and then rocky again. Rocky planets don’t usually form so far away from their home star,» says Thomas.
Current theories suggest that intense radiation near a star strips away gas, leaving behind small, rocky planets. Farther out, cooler conditions allow gas to accumulate, forming thick atmospheres around large planets.
Maximilian Günther, Cheops project scientist at the European Space Agency, says the finding highlights how much remains unknown.
«Much about how planets form and evolve is still a mystery. Finding clues like this one for solving this puzzle is precisely what Cheops set out to do.»
Scientists are cautious about overturning established theories based on a single example. The team therefore explored alternative explanations, including whether the outer planet might once have had an atmosphere stripped away by a violent impact, or whether the planets had swapped orbits over time. Their simulations ruled these scenarios out.
Instead, the evidence points towards a different process: the planets may not have formed all at once.
In most models, planets form together from a disc of gas and dust surrounding a young star. In the case of LHS 1903, the researchers suggest the star may have produced its planets sequentially.
This idea, known as inside-out planet formation, was proposed about a decade ago but has lacked strong observational evidence until now.
«By the time this outer planet formed, the system may have already run out of gas, which is considered vital for planet formation. Yet here is a small, rocky world, defying expectations. It seems that we have found first evidence for a planet which formed in what we call a gas-depleted environment», says Thomas.
The discovery raises a broader question about how representative our own Solar System really is.
«Historically, our planet formation theories are based on what we see and know about our Solar System,» says Isabel Rebollido, a research fellow at ESA. «As we are seeing more and more different exoplanet systems, we are starting to revisit these theories.»
As telescopes become more powerful, astronomers are uncovering an increasing variety of planetary systems, many of them stranger than once imagined. Each new discovery adds to the picture of how planets can form — and forces scientists to reconsider whether the neat order memorised by schoolchildren is the rule, or the exception.