The Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging a decision the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service made last year to not release a national wolf recovery plan, saying the species doesn’t need federal protection.
Tuesday’s lawsuit is the latest legal filing in the saga of whether gray wolves in the United States are still eligible to be listed under the Endangered Species Act, and comes amid efforts by Congress to delist the species through legislation.
More: South Dakota governor vetoes lab-grown meat ban, proposes moratorium
Wolves in the United States are managed in three different ways.
Wolves in the Northern Rockies — Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and parts of Washington and Oregon — were removed from the ESA more than a decade ago and are managed by their respective state wildlife agencies, which allow hunting.
A population of wolves in Minnesota are listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, while wolves in the remaining 44 U.S. states are listed as endangered species.
Gray wolves are listed as a threatened species in Minnesota under the Endangered Species Act and as endangered in 44 other states, including South Dakota. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
Gray wolves are listed as a threatened species in Minnesota under the Endangered Species Act and as endangered in 44 other states, including South Dakota. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
Under the first Trump administration in 2020, FWS had decided to delist gray wolves in the states outside of the northern Rockies, but a federal judge in California reversed that decision in 2022.
The current Trump administration is using the 2020 status review as the basis for its decision not to release a recovery plan, because the species no longer meets ESA requirements.
But the Center for Biological Diversity, which has been the foremost conservation group pursuing legal routes to secure protections for gray wolves, said the move circumvents established law.
“Instead of trying to illegally strip wolves of protections once again, the Fish and Wildlife Service must finally follow the law and develop a plan to achieve nationwide wolf recovery,” Collette Adkins, senior attorney and director of the Center’s Carnivore Conservation program said in a statement. “Wolves are so important to America’s biodiversity and they deserve a plan that guides conservation in places where they’re struggling like the West Coast and southern Rocky Mountains.”
The Center for Biological Diversity has previously sued to get the Service to come up with a comprehensive national recovery plan. In response to a previous settlement, the Biden administration in 2024 announced it would develop the first National Recovery Plan for gray wolves in the Lower 48, which was in the works until the end of the administration.
In a press release, the Center said a recovery plan “should describe actions needed to achieve full recovery of protected species,” but the current recovery plan — from 1992 — only focuses on wolves in Minnesota, failing to address places the species could recover such as the West Coast and southern Rocky Mountains.